Rester Bouche Bée Literally Flabbergasted

First of all, the  French expression  rester bouche bà ©e  has nothing to do with abeille, the French word for bee. Instead, its all about the French word  bouche,  which means mouth.    This phrase is one of a long list of French expressions that use  bouche, from  le bouche-à  -bouche  (mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) and Ta bouche!  (Shut up!) to faire la fine/petite bouche  (turn ones nose up) and  mettre un mot dans la bouche de quelquun (put words into someones mouth). The expression at hand is  rester bouche bà ©e, but it can also be used without rester. A third variation is regarder  bouche bà ©e. Meaning Without Rester: Open-Mouthedin a State of Stunned Surprise Picture someone who was just surprised—extremely surprised—and that persons jaw  drops open involuntarily; bouche bà ©e describes that physical reaction. Bouche bà ©e  means you are so surprised your mouth is agape; you are astonished, flabbergasted, open-mouthed.   Quand je lui ai annoncà © quon divorà §ait, elle à ©tait bouche bà ©e.When I announced to her that we were divorcing, her jaw dropped open/she was stunned. If someone is stunned by something good, all or part of mouth agape in a state of wonderment might be the best  English version of  bouche bà ©e  since the word agape derives from the Greek word love. If its something not so good, the best English equivalents  of  bouche bà ©e  might be astonished, flabbergasted or dumbfounded, the latter possibly  being best  since it carries a sense of worry. Meaning With Rester:Remain Speechlessin Stunned Surprise When you use bouche bà ©e with the verb rester, it involves a longer period of time. The cause of the astonishment might be something a little more serious as well. So the meaning switches a bit to remaining speechless. But the image is the same: mouth agape. Elle est restà ©e bouche bà ©e pendant quelques secondes, et puis elle a à ©clatà © en sanglots.She stayed there, mouth agape,  for a while, then she burst  into tears. Il en est restà ©Ã‚  bouche  bà ©e, mais na jamais oublià © la grà ¢ce de cette dame.He was left speechless and never forgot the ladys graciousness. Regarder Bouche Be: Gape at Tous les gens dans la rue le regardait  bouche  bà ©e.All the people in the street gaped speechlessly at him. Origins of the Term Bouche Be It comes from the very old, no longer used verb bà ©er, which means to be wide open. You may have read la porte à ©tait bà ©ante, which means  the door was wide open.   Pronunciation of Rester Bouche Be It sounds a bit like boosh bay. Note that bà ©e takes the acute e sound of French, not the long e sound in bee.The verb rester, like many  French infinitives, ends in er, which sounds, again, like the acute e in French.   Synonyms for Bouche Be Être abasourdi, à ©bahi, sidà ©rà ©, extrà ªmement à ©tonnà ©, choquà ©, frappà © de stupeur

Religious Traditions and History Essays - 1587 Words

Religious Traditions and History Thomas Lee History 233 February 2, 2013 Introduction to the Beginnings of Religion Religion is a staple of life in all countries of the world. There are many types of religious beliefs. This paper will attempt to piece together the different beliefs at various times of history and what the motivation behind each one was. Today’s religions weren’t always about the afterlife. The author, Kevin Reilly put it best when he said: â€Å"By what appears to be a remarkable coincidence, a number of the world’s great traditions turned to the goal of salvation or escape from the world at about the same time.† It†¦show more content†¦Buddha, which means â€Å"the enlightened one†, which was the name he received from his followers. Buddhism is different from Confucianism in that it didn’t teach about the family or rituals of this world, rather it taught enlightenment which leads to nirvana. There are eight awarenesses of enlightenments. â€Å"Freedom From Desire, Satisfaction, Serenity, Meticulous Effort, Correct Remembrance, Samadhi, Wisdom, and avoiding idle talk.† The Chinese during this time asked the Buddhist monks, why do you not marry? Their answer was â€Å"Wives, children, and property are the luxuries of the world, but simple living and inaction are the wonders of the Way.† The Buddhist’s wanted was to live a simple life and reach enlightenment and thus nirvana. Christianity Christianity is a salvation religion. Christians and Buddhists turned to the idea of salvation around the same time. Salvation means escape your earthly bonds. If you don’t follow a righteous path, meaning free of sin, then you are destined to be cast into the pit of darkness, otherwise known as hell. The new testament of the bible is what guides these true believers. The Catholics say, for instance, that if you sin and repent by going to confession your sins will be forgiven. This is the only way to ensure that the soul is clean. The idea of all Christian orthodoxy is that they follow the teachings of Christ, which has many different interpretations. Thus it follows that when you die you willShow MoreRelatedZionisms Greatest Conceit Essay1594 Words   |  7 PagesZIONISM’S GREATEST CONCEIT For a people whose traditions and rituals originate from the age of Egyptian pharaohs, modernity can be a relative term. The Jewish people have one of the oldest traditions of any culture on earth and have been a part of nearly every major civilization, from the ancient Egyptians, to the Persians, Romans, Byzantines, Ottomans and British empires. Over the centuries, they have traditions both of successful self-governance but also of persecution, hostility and exileRead MoreReligion At The University Of Dayton1552 Words   |  7 PagesAs a private, religious institution, the University of Dayton requires students to obtain an education that includes religion courses. This can be seen as advantageous in the eyes of society, further preparing young adults for the future. The academic study of religion at the University of Dayton is beneficial to American society because it educates, enlightens, emphasizes the university’s mission, and aids students in their future endeavors. Because of the diversity amongst the university’s studentRead MoreSyncretism, By Anita Maria Leopold919 Words   |  4 Pagesblending or melding of different religious traditions (695). Anita focuses on the history of syncretism and the problems which occurred such as theologians being accused of wrongly performing syncretism, she focused on the definition of syncretism and anti-syncretism and lastly the study of transforming religion into three leveled categories social, semiotic and cognitive. Syncretism can said to be the combination of different beliefs, it is the merging of several traditions. Scholars have said syncretismRead MoreChristopher Gist : The First Christmas Of Coshocton1420 Words   |  6 Pages In December of 1750, Christopher Gist was forming the first Christmas in Coshocton. This Christmas was unlike all others because of both the time period and the groups of people there. According to History of Coshocton County, Ohio: its past and present, 1740-1881 by N. N. Hill and A. A. Graham, Gist was in what is known as today as Coshocton County because the Ohio Company asked him to explore the Ohio River. Gist is known to be a well accomplished British explorer, surveyor and frontiersman whoRead MoreEssay on Why Is Religion Important?579 Words   |  3 Pagesspiritual life. -- Buddha So I say to you, Ask and it will be given to you; search, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened for you. --Jesus Christ Whether you consider yourself a religious person or not, or whether you think religion has played a positive or negative role in history, it is an incontrovertible fact that from the beginning of time, humans have engaged in activities that we now call religion, such as worship, prayer, and rituals marking important life passages. MoreoverRead MoreReligion in Schools Today1253 Words   |  6 PagesThe American Religious Experience In America today we all have choices to make in regards to our religious beliefs. Many young children are brought up today confused about religion and the significance it plays in their lives. There are many sanctions and rules now on what can and can t be thought or displayed to people on public property, but it wasn t always like this. In this paper I will be discussing the American religious experience in regards to the impact religion has in the publicRead MoreWhat can the examination of religious texts tell us about a religious tradition?1412 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"Religious text-Definition- writing that is venerated for the worship of a deity† (Soanes, 2005). During the early nineteenth century it was the writer Max Muller that said for the study of religion the religious text should be a scholar’s primary source and focus of their studies. But is this correct? If religious texts are the only evidence that scholars use to study religion can an accurate pict ure and understanding of religion be gained? But is Max Muller Correct in his assumption? As a resultRead MoreReligion and Violence Essay examples1081 Words   |  5 Pagesa different spectrum is the way religious beliefs utilise non violent mechanisms that try to diminish the impacts of aggressive behaviour. When we think of religion and violence we do not think to situate them together. This is because â€Å"theologically, it can certainly be concluded that all religions have the goal of peace† . People who are outsider of a religious tradition can make many generalisations. In this essay it will discuss why some religious traditions in South East Asia oppose violenceRead MoreInformative Speech On Halloween880 Words   |  4 Pagesthat Halloween has gone through over the course of history. Thesis statement: Today I will share with you the origins, cultural effects and transformation of Halloween throughout history. Introduction: Do you view Halloween as just another tradition made to reward kids? Rather do you enjoy the time of celebration yourself? You may have based some of these opinions on what Halloween represents however, this can be manipulated due to religious groups or friendly opinions. Let’s get down to howRead MoreDifferences Between Christianity And Islam1444 Words   |  6 Pagesis filled with diverse religious backgrounds, â€Å"humanity forms but one community† (â€Å"Nostra Aetate†). There is an indisputable bond between humans, regardless of the beliefs they hold. Christianity and Islam are two religious traditions dominating the world, accounting for over 55% of the population (â€Å"Common Word†). While they greatly differ, the two have undeniable similarities that offer a common ground for the two traditions to unite. It is necessary for these two traditions to coexist and strive

Family Law- Hindu Law Free Essays

string(138) " on the ground that in India, where most of the population and especially women \(wife\) do not have actual possession over any property\." DARSHAN SINGH PATIALVI – ADVOCATE GENERAL | Restitution Of Conjugal Rights: Criticism Revisited| Introduction:- Section 1[1] of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 embodies the concept of  Restitution of Conjugal Rights  under which after solemnization of marriage if one of the spouses abandons the other, the aggrieved party has a legal right to file a petition in the matrimonial court for restitution of conjugal rights. This right can be granted to any of the spouse. This section is identical to section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. We will write a custom essay sample on Family Law- Hindu Law or any similar topic only for you Order Now [2] The provision is in slightly different wordings in the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, but it has been interpreted in such a manner that it has been given the same meaning as under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954. However, the provision is different under the section 32 Indian Divorce Act, 1869 but efforts are being made to give it such an interpretation so as to bring it in consonance with the other laws. The provision under Muslim law is almost the same as under the modern Hindu law, though under Muslim law and under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 a suit in a civil court has to be filed and not a petition as under other laws. [3]The constitutional validity of the provision has time and again been questioned and challenged. The earliest being in 1983 before the Andhra Pradesh High Court[4] where the Hon’ble High Court held that the impugned section was unconstitutional. The Delhi High Court in  Harvinder Kaur v Harminder Singh,[5] though had non-conforming views. Ultimately Supreme Court in  Saroj Rani v. Sudharshan,[6] gave a judgment which was in line with the Delhi High Court[7] views and upheld the constitutional validity of the section 9 and over-ruled the decision given in  T. Sareetha v. T. Venkatasubbaiah. [8]It is a sad commentary that despite various courts including the Apex Court of the Country upholding the validity of section 9. Many jurists still have doubts with respect to the soundness of this section and demand its abolishment. Abolitionist’s View The abolitionists argue that it is a remedy that was unknown to Hindu law till the British introduced it in the name of social reforms. Even when the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was being passed in the Parliament, there were voices of scepticism regarding the efficacy of this remedy. [9] Sir J. Hannen in  Russell v. Russell[10] also vehemently opposed the remedy. Further, they are of the view any law that forces any person to live with another person is contrary to the value of the society. The remedy openly violates the fundamental right to life, privacy and equality hence is unconstitutional. Further more, there is frequently insincerity in the petitioner’s intention. The remedy is blatantly misused to achieve ulterior purposes other than reconciliation, the root cause being S. 13 (1-A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and has created an additional ground of divorce. Yet another major problem with restitution petitions is that it is used as a defence for maintenance suits. This remedy has been repeatedly misused, abused and exploited. 11]Adding more, the procedure prescribed to enforce this decree under Order 21 Rule 32 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is also criticized on the ground that in India, where most of the population and especially women (wife) do not have actual possession over any property. You read "Family Law- Hindu Law" in category "Essay examples" In such cases, if a restitution decree is not complied with, then the court is required to ascerta in the share of the wife in the property of her husband, when it is not divided and arrive at her share in the property, but this involves cumbersome procedures. Difficulty also arises if the husband does not have a property in his name. Further, it is not correct to think that coercing a person that his property would be attached and sold away can change the attitude of the adamant spouse and make him obey the decree. Counter View However, in my opinion, section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act is one of the most misunderstood sections of the Matrimonial law. Despite the controversy it has continuously been upheld by the Judiciary. Even the legislature through various committees and its reports has supported this section. All the reasons so stated by abolitionists can be easily encountered if this socially benefiting section is read in the right light and its essence is understood. It is imperative that a clear understanding of the section 9 is required because it is often invoked. First of all, it cannot be said that the concept of conjugal rights and that its embodiment in section 9 is foreign to the Indian culture and society. It may be borne in mind that conjugal rights. Such a right is inherent in the very institution of marriage itself. [12] The only thing is new is the embodiment of this concept which has been prevailing since antiquity. The prime objective of section 9 is to preserve the marriage. [13] According to the Hindu Marriage Act marriage is a civil contract and a religious ceremony. [14] It is a contract of the greatest importance in civil institutions, and it is charged with a vast variety of rights and obligation,[15] cohabitation being one of them. It is the very soul of marriage and this section enforces the right of cohabitation. If there is no reasonable ground for living apart, the court orders for cohabitation and enforces the Contract there is nothing wrong as the parties had voluntarily stipulated this at the time of entering into the marriage bond. [16]Section 9, in actuality, is a means of saving the marriage, it is in a sense an extension of sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 23 of the Act which encourage reconciliation by the court. It is the policy of the Act that the parties should live together and assist in the maintenance of marriages. [17] By enforcing cohabitation, the court is serving this purpose of the Act. Further, it is criticized on the ground that it allows the withdrawing spouse to take an advantage of his own wrong, which is against the scheme of section 23 and allows him/her to apply for a decree in case of non consummation of the marriage within one year of passing of decree. However in  Dharmendra Kumar v. Usha Kumari,[18] the Hon’ble Court clearly stated that The expression â€Å"in order to be a  Ã¢â‚¬Ëœwrong†Ã‚  within the meaning of section 23(1) (a) the conduct alleged has to be something more than mere disinclination to agree to an offer of reunion, it must be misconduct serious enough to justify denial of the relief to which the husband or the wife is otherwise entitled to. [19]It is also often claimed to be gender discriminatory and violative of Article 14. T. Sareetha case[20] confirmed this view. It is obvious that the judge considered the entire question of restitution from the point of view of the woman. It seems that it has been overlooked that restitution of conjugal rights can also be claimed by the wife. It is relevant to state that the section is gender neutral as by the Amending Act 44 of 1964 either party to a marriage has been allowed to present a petition for divorce on the ground given in section 13(1-A). Even the party found guilty in restitution proceedings is entitled to petition for divorce under section 13 (1-A)(ii). There is complete equality of sexes here and equal protection of the laws. [21] Therefore this claim of abolitionist is incorrect. Section 9 is also criticized for being an instrument of forced sexual relation and hence being violative of right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21. But much contrary is its purpose. The remedy of restitution aims at cohabitation and consortium and not merely at sexual intercourse. [22] In  Halsbury’s Laws of England[23]  it is observed: (cohabitation) aces not necessarily mean serial intercourse, which the court cannot enforce, so that refusal of sexual intercourse by itself does not constitute refusal to cohabit. [24] In support of this proposition the high authority of Lord Stowell in  Forster v. Forster,[25]  Orme v. Orme, [26] and  Rowe v. Rowe[27] may be cited. One thing is clear from Lord Stowell’s decision in  Forster v. Forster[28] and Halsbury’s statement of law that the Court does not and cannot enforce sexual intercourse. In cases like T Sareetha, [29] the concept of marriage is pictured as if consists as if it consists of nothing els e except sex. Chaudhary, J. ‘s over-emphasis on sex is the fundamental fallacy in his reasoning. He seems to suggest that restitution decree has only one purpose, that is, to compel the unwilling wife to â€Å"have sex with the husband†. This view was discarded long ago in as early as 1924 Sir Henry Duke President in  Jackson v. Jackson. [30]To say that restitution decree â€Å"subject a person by the long arm of the to a positive sex act† is to take the grossest view of the marriage institution. [31]Therefore, it is fallacy to hold that the restitution of conjugal rights constituted â€Å"the starkest form of governmental invasion† of â€Å"marital privacy†. 32] Further, applying the standard that law has to be just, fair and reasonable as enunciated inManeka Gandhi,[33] section 9 said tries to bring the parties together. Whether to grant restitution decree would be just, fair and reasonable in the facts and circumstances of a given case is left to the court to be decided in its judicial discretion. What better guarantee can the law afford for the â€Å"inviolability of the body and mind† of the wife and her â€Å"marital privacy†[34] And therefore it can be safely stated that section 9 is not violative of Article 21. It also stated by critique that restitution decree serve as a stepping stone to divorce and is condemned to be a passage or passport to divorce. The reason behind the scheme of putting non consummation of marriage after one year of passing the decree of restitution of conjugal rights under section 13 of the Act is that the Indian Legislature believes that there should not be a sudden break of the marriage tie. It believes in reconciliation and that that cooling-off period is not only desirable but essential. If the marriage cannot be saved even after passing the decree of restitution it must be dissolved. A factual separation gives an easily justifiable indication of breakdown. [35] That is, under the Act it serves a double purpose. It first finds the fault and where it lies. Secondly it leads to the dissolution of the marriage, if there is no resumption of cohabitation. Further, recognizing non-consumption of marriage after 1 year of passing of Restitution Decree as a ground of divorce enables the aggrieved spouse to apply to the court for maintenance under section 25; and maintenance pendente lite may also be claimed by making out a case for the same as provided in section 24. This enables a wife, who does not desire disruption of the marriage or even judicial separation from the husband, to secure provision for her support by an order of the court under the matrimonial jurisdiction conferred on it, instead of filing a suit for maintenance under the law relating to maintenance now embodied in the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956. [36]People who are against the concept of restitution of conjugal rights argue that England which is the nation of origin of the concept has deleted this remedy from its legislation and India is still continuing it. The Law Commission, in their Fifty-ninth Report have- not recommended its abolition nor in their Seventy-First Report of 1978. The Commission was aware that it had been abolished in England under section 20 of the Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1970. However, it is germane to state that retaining this section all these years is not without reason. The truth is that the legislature has not accepted the breakdown theory in toto, as has been accepted in England. [37] Adding on, a recent writer[38] has suggested that â€Å"the opinion of Derrett is more realistic and that the Hindu society is not mature enough to do away with the remedy. Its abolition would be like throwing away the baby with the bath-water. â€Å"[39]It is also argued that the methodology adopted in execution of the decree as mentioned in the Code- of Civil Procedure (0-21 Rules 32 and 33) is erroneous as it provides for financial sanction in case of non fulfillment of this decree. It is to be remembered that marriage is also contractual in nature. Providing for a financial sanction in case of non fulfillment of contractual obligation is a common practice. Also that enforcement by attachment of property is provided by court where the disobedience to such a decree is willful i. e. s deliberate, in spite of the opportunities and there are no other impediments. 0 21, Rules 31 and 32 C. P. C. provide only a financial sanction to serve as an inducement by the court to effectuate restitution and serve a social purpose i. e. prevention of the break-up of the marriage. [40]Often the case of  Russel v. Russel[41] is quoted by abolitionist, however the big ger picture as to why Lord Herschell called this remedy as barbarous is not brought in light. What he said and meant was that reasonable excuse, an essential for the decree of Restitution of Conjugal Right, was not confined only to the grounds of divorce. It can as well be â€Å"something short of legal cruelty† which might constitute a reasonable excuse for refusing restitution. What was stated by him was that if the meaning of reasonable excuse was restricted to the grounds, then this remedy shall be barbarous. This is precisely what has been taken care of in India as the history of the Act would show. Section 9(2) as originally enacted provided that â€Å"Nothing shall be pleaded in answer to a petition for restitution of conjugal rights which shall not be a ground for judicial separation or for nullity of marriage or for divorce. This created considerable difficulty. The Law Commission in its Fifty-Ninth Report recommended its deletion. It is now possible for the party to plead a reasonable excuse which may not necessarily be a ground either for judicial separation or nullity or divorce. So the Act was amended and by Act No. 68 of 1976 section 9 (2) was deleted. This brought the law in conformity with the opinion of Lord H erschell. It will, therefore, appear that Lord Herschell’s expression â€Å"barbarous† was used in a different context. 42]Conclusion In summation, it may be stated that the grounds and arguments are baseless and they do not sufficiently prove that the Remedy of Restitution of Conjugal Rights is archaic, barbarous and violative of the basic Human Rights. It cannot be said that this remedy is unconstitutional. Section 9 has sufficient safeguards to prevent the marriage from being a tyranny. [43]In truth, it serves the social good purpose, by promoting reconciliation between the parties and maintenance of matrimonial. It protects the society from denigrating. And all the years that it has been enforce it has efficiently played it’s a role. References [1] Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 reads as follows:- â€Å"When either the husband or the wife has without reasonable excuse withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply, by a petition to the district court, for restitution of conjugal rights and the court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition and that there is no legal ground why the application should not be granted, may decree restitution of conjugal rights accordingly†. [2] After the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976. [3] Paras Diwan, Law of Marriage ; Divorce, 4th Ed. p. 328. [4] T. Sareetha v. T. Venkatasubbaiah, A. I. R. 1983 A. P. 356. [5] A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [6] A. I. R. 1984 S. C. 1562. [7] Harvinder Kaur v Harminder Singh, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [8] A. I. R. 1983 A. P. 356. [9] Jaspal Singh, Law of Marriage and Divorce in India , (1983), p. 83. [10] (1897) AC 395. [11] A reference has been made to Mr. Prashanth S. J, Hindu Women And Restitution Of Conjugal Rights: Do We Need The Remedy [12] Kondal v. Ranganavaki, A. I. R. 1924 Mad. 49. [13] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhr, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [14] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhr, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [15] Linda v. Belisario (1795) 1 Hag. Con. 216(21) per Sir William Scott at pp. 30, 232. [16] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhr, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [17] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [18] A. I. R. 1977 S. C. 2218. [19] Dharmendra Kumar v. Usha Kumari, A. I. R. 1977 S. C. 2218. [20] T. Sareetha v. T. Venkatasubbaiah, A. I. R. 1983 A. P. 356. [21] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [22] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [23] 12th Vol. , 3rd Ed. , p. 284. 24] A reference may be made to Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [25] (1790) I Hag. Con. 144. [26] (1924) 2 Addf 382-162 E. R. 335 [27] (1865) 34 L. J. P. M;A 111 [28] (1790) I Hag. Con. 144. [29] A. I. R. 1983 A. P. 356. [30] (1924) Probate 19 (2). [31] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [32] A reference may be made to Harvinder Kaur v. Ha rmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [33] Mrs. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (UOI) and Anr, A. I. R. 1978 S. C. 597. [34] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [35] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Delhi 66. [36] S. A. Desai, Mulla Hindu Law, Vol. 2, 19th Ed. , p. 60. [37] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [38] R. C. Nagpal, Modern Hindu Law, (1983), p. 110. [39] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [40] Saroj Rani v. Sudharshan Kumar Chadha, A. I. R. 1984 S. C. 1562. [41] (1897) A. C. 395 (16). [42] Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Choudhry, A. I. R. 1984 Del. 66. [43] Saroj Rani v. Sudharshan Kumar Chadha, A. I. R. 1984 S. C. 1562. | | How to cite Family Law- Hindu Law, Essay examples

Machiavellis Prince Essay Example For Students

Machiavellis Prince Essay Machiavellis PrinceThe Prince, written in 1513 by Niccolo Machiavelli is regarded as one of themost crucial yet controversial works in the field of political science. It holdsMachiavellis observations and reflections on Italian political history. It waswritten in response to the decay of the Italian states system. This book wasdesigned specifically to captivate and transform its readers to analyze andadopt Machiavellis perspective as it was initially written and dedicated toLorenzo De Medici, the ruler of Florence. Although this book was written in the15th century, the ideas are very much applicable in todays societies. Machiavellis goals and views as perceived by the readers of this book seem tobe in contrast with the humanist beliefs and teachings of his time. As in hisbook he promotes a secular society and felt morality should be set aside as itobstructed power. He reflects that a prince should not consider whether his actsare moral or immoral while he acts in the favor of the state. To achieve that,states goals must be the primary focus for a prince. If a prince acts immorallyto achieve the states goals, then it does not reflect his personal standards orbeliefs, as it is a role that he plays for the state. The effect of fortune ongovernment and the course of humanity is an important theme in the book. AsMachiavelli believed that fortune played a major part in at least half of mensactions. The force of fortune was so strong that it was mentally in the back ofevery mens mind, but their were steps that could be taken to lower the effect. Furthermore, Machiavelli holds a very low opinion of most people and thinks theyhave been selfish towards the state. He concludes from his observations that menare ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers. He points out that theywill accompany you when you are privileged and abandon or turn against you atthe time of danger. A prince therefore must be cautious while interacting withthe people but should have a favorable standing amongst them. ThePrince was written and completed by Machiavelli in response to Italyspersistent political problems and the emergence of a new rule in Florence. Therefore with these two situations at hand, Machiavelli carefully devisedThe Prince and primarily focused on the responsibilities, aims andobjectives that a new prince should concentrate upon. To explain hisarguments, Machiavelli draws out examples from various historical episodes andhis political experience. He stresses in his book that political leaders shouldseek solutions from the past in order to cure current problems. His opinionrevolved around that fact that instead of evolution and progress there wasrepetition as a recurring cycle of events shaped history. This can be seenreflected in most of Machiavellis arguments in The Prince, whichweakens his arguments to an extent. He further concludes that men throughouthistory have been selfish and cheats. They are not worthy of any lenience andtherefore should be treated with the same measures as in the past. The Prince,has been criticized both in a positively and negatively. Some have praisedMachiavelli for his realism and irony in a subtle manner. On the other hand heis acclaimed for having his work seen as supporting a republican form ofgovernment by exposing the faults of princedoms, and praise his ability toseparate political from moral issues. Machiavelli can also be seen as na?ve,promoting fraud, force and immorality in politics, using beneficial ends tojustify evil means, and betraying republican ideals. There is also a departurefrom classical models to a more humanist approach, when Machiavelli urges rulersto take on the characteristics of animals by using force when the situationrequires. Although Machiavelli refers to classical accounts of rulers beingtrained by centaurs, his suggestion that rulers be less than fully humancritical challenges the humanist tradition which would never have humans behaveas beasts. The Prince, is often referred to as a book inspired by the devil.This piece of literature is very interesting not only for Political Sciencestudents but also for everyone part of a society. It gives an excellent insightto understanding the qualities of human kind. In the 500 years since this bookhas been written it has been a major source of contention and debate. Inaddition this book is highly recommended and enjoyable to read.